The flu, H1N1 and the flu shots – My Fall Statement – Dr. Maurer
The seasonal flu is upon us and the marketing of shots is in full force. And with the H1N1 swine flu in the news, we have never seen so much publicity about the flu as this year. Here is my current thought-out opinion on the subject and hopefully, this will help you make rational choices that are best for you and your families’ health.
The Seasonal Flu: Every year there are various strains of influenza that travel the globe at various level of contagiousness. Exposure to these viruses causes us to have typically viral symptoms: cold symptoms such as stuffiness, sore throat with the probability of accompanying aches and fever. Getting these predominantly minor illnesses provides lifelong immunity to contracting that strain or similar strains again. This is the theory of the vaccination, although it is more likely that the vaccine does not impart lifelong immunity and requires re-dosing every year to be effective. Pharmaceutical companies work intently to guess which strains will be the next year’s flu – this turns out to be unsuccessful.
Within the past years, the vaccine has not significantly reduced the likelihood of getting sick in the people that got the shot. That would seem like the demise of the vaccine, but in a portion of people who did get the shot, the symptoms if they did still get the flu were less severe.
Who should get the shot? If someone is likely to be clinically debilitated or their life threatened from the symptoms of the flu, it is worth getting the shot. Also, people with low immunity from chemotherapy or high doses of prednisone, or people more immobilized from surgery, age or disability.
Who should not get the shot? If someone is generally able to move and can get a cold and be over it in a week. The CDC used to recommend the shot for the elderly and immune-compromised. Within the past decade, they have added children, people in contact with children, health workers, elderly and people in contact with the elderly…I don’t think they have left anyone out anymore. Marketing has gotten the better of prudent medical discernment.
What do you do for the flu? If reducing the severity of flu symptoms when you do get it are all the vaccine is good for in most people, there are several CAM therapies that do this. Echinacea, Sambucus and zinc lozenges, are all indicated therapies. And for prevention…washing your hands and instructing your children in the house to do the same provides significant protection in study after study.
Swine Flu - H1N1: This flu has the “swine flu” name, which brings up the fears of the infamous swine flu of 1918 that struck the world with deadly vigor. In retrospect, it appears that the sudden worldwide spread of people during World War I and the malnourishment and stress of the soldiers deployed helped create the aggressiveness the virus displayed throughout the world.
This outbreak of H1N1 was being watched closely to ascertain whether it would become an aggressive strain. The illness in America has remained predominantly mild, with surprisingly low contagious spread. Less than 30% of people exposed directly to someone with H1N1 actually get the disease. Furthermore, it turns out that people born before 1955 are apparently not prone to getting the swine flu. Presumably, a strain like this went through several decades ago and imparted life-long immunity in many people. Thanks to our public health officials for watching so closely, if it were to have become more serious, they would have had good data to track the virulence and spread. But the poorly tested vaccine is now being mandated without justification.
DO NOT TAKE THE H1N1 VACCINE. So what to do for the swine flu? Well it turns out that it is no more serious than any other flu for us. So no new intervention other than listed above for the seasonal flu. Reasons to question the vaccine:
First, the H1N1 vaccine has been made with the mercury-containing preservative, thimersol. Shame on them.
Second, the H1N1 vaccine was fast-tracked with 3 weeks of studies then a release date set.
Third, because it was requested by federal officials in response to a pandemic, it is said that the companies that make the vaccine are absolved of any responsibility if the vaccine is a problem.
Fourth and most important, the additive squalene was added to make the immune system super reactive after the shot. This way one shot rather than two is needed for immune response, thereby doubling the amount of people that can be treated with the doses on hand. Squalene has only really been studied on elderly with more deficient immune systems. This chemical has not been adequately tested on pregnant women, children and younger people, and the primary risk is autoimmune disease in the future months to years after the shot. In the New York Times on September 22nd, they state, “…federal officials say the savings are not large enough to offset the possible risks and extra complexity of using the adjuvants [squalene].”
Fifth, people born before 1955 have protection against this current strain of H1N1. It is because they were exposed to the actual H1N1 and built a life-long immunity to the virus. Most vaccines when given do not impart lifelong immunity and require boosters to deal with the loss of immune-memory to that virus. This would effectively push the illness into later years of life.
I am glad the vaccine was developed, this is a good public health exercise to stave off a potentially devastating illness like in 1918, but this H1N1 is not that disease. The hype about the swine flu vaccine should not blind us to seeing the simple risk/benefit ratio that in this case leans to the risk side.
---Dr. Richard Maurer, September 24th, 2009